@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
5
edit-2
2Y

I mean, it seems you’re framing the issue in a disingenuous way, unless I’m missing something. Cutting carbon emissions is about mitigating the environmental and atmospheric effects of global warming, not soil health. I agree that both are important things to work on for future generations, but I think the global warming thing is the more acute issue, hence the focus. If this planet becomes uninhabitable in the next 300 years, then our soil issues are mute. Additionally, the atmospheric changes of global warming are important for biodiversity and soil health, but not necessarily the other way around.

Granted, these are not my areas of expertise, so it’s very possible that I’m wrong. Feel free to correct me with available data.

Edit: grammar

Track_Shovel
creator
link
fedilink
English
32Y

95% of food production comes from soil, and areable soils are disappearing at an alarming rate. FAO in 2015 stated there are approximately 60 harvests left…

Soils contain a shitpile of carbon, and that’s not including organic (peat) soils. Disturbance and increased air temps speed up this release.

I don’t think I’m understating things

Create a post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 1 user online
  • 828 users / day
  • 79 users / week
  • 904 users / month
  • 2.75K users / 6 months
  • 0 subscribers
  • 2.97K Posts
  • 31.5K Comments
  • Modlog