We’re going to keep pushing you off of our platform. Unlike corporate social media, we don’t want the kind of “user engagement” that trolls like you provide.
The way you talk makes it sound like you want to be all high and mighty. I understand vigilantism can do that, but if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub), your findings are simply false. Think of who you actually speak for.
if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub)
I don’t know what mod/comm you’re talking about, but some of your banned alts were mods, and so is this one, which created [email protected], so that’s possible.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Rules
Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it’s name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub’s intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don’t get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
We’re going to keep pushing you off of our platform. Unlike corporate social media, we don’t want the kind of “user engagement” that trolls like you provide.
Spoken like someone just trying to be inciteful.
The way you talk makes it sound like you want to be all high and mighty. I understand vigilantism can do that, but if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub), your findings are simply false. Think of who you actually speak for.
I’m pretty sure @[email protected] isn’t a vigilante.
I don’t know what mod/comm you’re talking about, but some of your banned alts were mods, and so is this one, which created [email protected], so that’s possible.
That depends on your definition.