A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.
Rules:
- Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
- No spam posting.
- Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
- Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
- No trolling.
Resources:
> Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
> Questions? DM the mods!
- 1 user online
- 218 users / day
- 9 users / week
- 244 users / month
- 841 users / 6 months
- 0 subscribers
- 542 Posts
- 8.93K Comments
- Modlog
I understand this part :) I use a fairly complex firewall at work though I only know bits and pieces from reading different manuals. I think the part I didn’t understand was how exactly the routing worked differently in IPv4 vs v6. I get that because NAT happens in IPv4, packets can’t be routed at all without the firewall/router but I wasn’t sure what was the mechanism by which v6 made sure that packets went through the router, especially when you have stuff like v6 DHCP relays.
Ah, I misunderstood your original comment, oops! But yes, IPv6 packets are routed just like IPv4 ones, just without the NAT’ing process i.e. the packet remains untouched the entire trip.