The wording of the headline, and the people in the photo made me confused.
First: Is this badly worded? Did it mean a mother of twins’ child has just had quadruplets? That’s the mother at the back in the middle, her 2 twin sons beside her in…clinical gowns? No…
Second: The mother had twins, one of them has had quadruplets, it’s him the picture is foc…no, wait - same thing.
Third: The woman at the front has 2 twin daughters (also in the picture), and she’s now had an additional set of quadruplets and the father is staring at the camera because…? There’s no way in hell he didn’t know she was having quadruplets.
Fourth: Why are there 3 people in the back? Like, they’re taking the focus.
I don’t think he’s staring at the camera like this because he didn’t expect it, but because a birth of quarduplets takes a lot of time. He’s probably just really exhausted and is trying to keep his eyes open.
The moment he realises his game backlog will remain untouched and continue to grow until his retirement just after his excessive Steam Summer Sale spending. Talk about modern day horror…
This is false. Having kids is very important. The earth can sustainably support billions more. That is, if a certain percentage of people did not hoard all the wealth and resources.
Having kids in order to support society is basically treating children as a resource. Why don’t we fix up society a bit so we can start having children brought into society as people? Right now kids are basically just cogs in a machine.
Until quite suddenly we don’t. There’s going to be a massive population plunge in about 20 years with a large aging population and nobody to help fill the gap behind them. Granted, I think that’s where AI and robotics can probably help which is what Japan seems to be banking on.
I am looking forward to the massive population plunge… as is the rest of the earth. Hopefully, with less humans we can have better social programs and more earth friendly usage of resources.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Rules:
Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Twins look resigned to their slavery.
removed by mod
The wording of the headline, and the people in the photo made me confused.
First: Is this badly worded? Did it mean a mother of twins’ child has just had quadruplets? That’s the mother at the back in the middle, her 2 twin sons beside her in…clinical gowns? No…
Second: The mother had twins, one of them has had quadruplets, it’s him the picture is foc…no, wait - same thing.
Third: The woman at the front has 2 twin daughters (also in the picture), and she’s now had an additional set of quadruplets and the father is staring at the camera because…? There’s no way in hell he didn’t know she was having quadruplets.
Fourth: Why are there 3 people in the back? Like, they’re taking the focus.
Why does it focus on the mother and not “couple who had twins, has quadruplets”. Idk, the wording just sucks.
The mother gave birth to them. If that’s the thing that confuses you I don’t know what else to say.
deleted by creator
The title isn’t confusing, the extra people in the photo can be, but then you look at who’s holding the babies and infer those are the parents.
I don’t think he’s staring at the camera like this because he didn’t expect it, but because a birth of quarduplets takes a lot of time. He’s probably just really exhausted and is trying to keep his eyes open.
Both can be true.
The moment he realises his game backlog will remain untouched and continue to grow until his retirement just after his excessive Steam Summer Sale spending. Talk about modern day horror…
I laughed out loud because this is my reality.
Most people get to have sex at least six times for this.
So 8 next time?
Christ on a bike. It’s a vagina, not a clown car.
Found a Stanhope fan
it’s time for this fad to stop. we don’t need anymore kids. we’ve got more than enough people already.
This is false. Having kids is very important. The earth can sustainably support billions more. That is, if a certain percentage of people did not hoard all the wealth and resources.
We don’t need more people. We now have the ability to automatize a vast majority of infrastructure.
This is a big part of the problem, and unfortunately it’s never going to change.
Having kids in order to support society is basically treating children as a resource. Why don’t we fix up society a bit so we can start having children brought into society as people? Right now kids are basically just cogs in a machine.
Until quite suddenly we don’t. There’s going to be a massive population plunge in about 20 years with a large aging population and nobody to help fill the gap behind them. Granted, I think that’s where AI and robotics can probably help which is what Japan seems to be banking on.
Only true in specific countries though right? Globally doesn’t seem like a plunge is likely.
I am looking forward to the massive population plunge… as is the rest of the earth. Hopefully, with less humans we can have better social programs and more earth friendly usage of resources.
You’re looking forward to unprecedented mass suffering for the human race resulting in a decimated population? 😬
I’m never gonna financially recover from this
deleted by creator
I cannot See the pic at all