Bait used to be believable

So you’re only interested in someone that pushes engagement and not in who’s actually fit to be a mod?

You’ve also called out other users for not having post history in that community. Is engagement your only concern? Wether or not they post, their critiscism is valid and holds water.

I don’t understand how “I’ve felt he’s pushing an agenda” isn’t an instant disqualifier from moderation.

Nominating him for moderator is an endorsement of their opinions, you’ve granted them power therefore you hold the opinion they’re of sound judgement.

I’m hesitant to post in a 'health" community that’s more interested in driving up engagement than combatting pseudoscience and misinfo