It’s not a weird opinion. It is what we have been conditioned to think. Capitalism tells us that our worth is linked to our work.

It’s taken me a long time, but I no longer feel that the purpose of life is to be “productive” but rather to be happy. If you are curious about what other assumptions about the world and how things “have to be” I’d suggest reading “the one dimensional man” by Marcuse.

aspired to be a dogwalker for 10-15 hours a week. She technically worked, but used others as a crutch to avoid doing anything more than the bare minimum.

So some work is inherently worse than other work? I feel this attitude is a slippery slope, it assigns moral virtue to financial achievement.

You criticize what she does for income. You haven’t even guessed as to what she does. I think the fundamental difference in our thoughts is that I don’t believe that a job defines a person. Someone can “do the minimum” and still provide benefits to their community.

Is there anyone who wants to nothing?

I think we are so entrenched in capatalism that not working feels like doing nothing.

I think our disagreement is that I feel work is not the same as labor.

I have been unemployed for about 4 years, as I took time off to raise my child. I am an active member of my community, I cook, I clean, I care for my daughter. I think labeling everyone who doesn’t have a job as selfish and lazy is propaganda. I feel I provide a bigger benefit to the world now than l did when I had a job that was ultimately worthless.

The luxury of having good and fulfilling work shouldn’t be limited to those who have professions and education allowing for that. I reject the assertion that work and self worth should be applied to every situation. I feel that attitude quickly leads to thoughts like “they just work retail, they aren’t really doing anything!”

Why does someone have to be productive/profitable to not be selfish and lazy?

A surprising amount went wrong.

While there are a sea of complaints, the biggest for me was that all of the characters stopped having internal logic. Take Jamie, he had a character arc moving from a vain knight avoiding responsibility and having an incestuous relationship with his sister, to having depth, showing that he was wracked with guilt for breaking his oath to help people. Falling in love with a woman for her character and who she was. Being responsible and honorable again. Then the last season came around and he dropped all of his growth to be with his sister.

It’s like D&D decided that there would be a cool scene of him dieing with Cersi and didn’t care how he got there.