Refugee from lemm.ee.
Free Palestine!
Baby Marxist. Feral debater. Will continue to “argue” as long as you give attention.
I return in kind the energy sent to me.
Libs be prepared 😈
- 0 Posts
- 37 Comments
Human rights law professor and former UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, Juan E. Méndez, commented in April 2022: “I think this deserves an investigation. Of course, it would be a serious mistake to ignore the fact that many of the victims so far were clearly civilians, perhaps because they were Ukrainians – this is a national origin, a condition that fits into the partial definition of genocide … But that the fact that civilians are killed is not necessarily genocide”
Way to link a source that confirms that these claims have not been confirmed. It says that NGOs suspect there may be a genocide ongoing. And it’s linked to one NGO that I haven’t heard of.
You know what’s really interesting is that, when this went to the ICJ for Israel-Palestine, they almost immediately made Israel take a step back on Palestine because they were worried about their protection, but they haven’t done the same thing for Ukraine and Russia, even though they’re engaged in court in the same way, even though Russia is also accusing Ukraine of committing a Russian genocide in the Donbas region.
I mean, I was getting attacked by him earlier, but it seems that Philip isn’t quite the same as Pug. He’ll step back occasionally and try to reach out to your better side.
PJ is basically just an attack dog.
Was reading things a little too fast, my dyslexia was getting me.
I think I’ve done okay so far.
“To show that it was widespread and systematic, we would need a lot more evidence than has come to light to date and a lot more corroborative evidence than is being put out there,” says Madeleine Rees, general secretary of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.
You know, for somebody who claims they read a lot, you sure need to read more.
Yes, I was pointing out your hypocrisy, the one that you’re still very clearly showing, where you use the same things that you’re poking at me with, that you just protected PJ for doing.
Well, it’s not imagined if he’s getting, you know, banned for it. And there’s a lot of us here to corroborate how much of a “fun guy” he’s been.
I never claimed I was anti-political, I only claimed that PJ has a propensity to attack people. I will continue to argue with somebody until I feel like my point is across, and if you continue to comment, so will I.
I don’t care about his viewpoint. He’s more than allowed to have his viewpoint. He is allowed to advocate for harm reduction. He doesn’t post sources to anything that he claims, he won’t back up anything that he’s talking about, he just gets nasty. I don’t get nasty until you’re nasty first. I give what I get.
If he would, you know, maybe respond with well meaning comment talking about it in a debating fashion, and then let it go when it’s clear people aren’t going to agree, you would have a point, but that’s not what he does, and that’s not how he argues.
For instance, I happen to know quite a lot about October 7th and Hamas, and so he’s claiming that there was a ton of sexual violence done by Hamas but when the UN investigated it, they did not find systematic evidence of sexual violence, nor did Israel work with them, which is unusual. Not only that, the report he references is one that has been discredited as a source of statistics for sexual violence on October 7th. When I point out that in other similar situations like what happened in Rwanda or in Syria that they were able to track individual people the majority of the time with less surveillance I get called names for daring to ask these questions.
That’s the epitome of the way your boy debates.
He claims there’s a Russian genocide. I point out that the ICJ did not find convincing evidence that Russia was committing a genocide in Ukraine where they did find some semblance of that in Palestine. He immediately just tells me I’m parroting Russian propaganda and that I’m a Nazi. I asked for a source and he says that I’m sealioing.
Believe what you want, but this guy is not good news, he does not argue in good faith, and while he may have people’s best interests at heart, he’s certainly not winning any hearts.
Are you exposing yourself as a mod of the politics community where you deleted my accurate comment that Russia isn’t committing a genocide?
And you’re pissed off about other admins abusing their power.
Alright, you little removed, since you like to whine about the Russian genocide so much, why don’t you link something from the UN claiming about how Russia’s committing a genocide? Maybe some other NGO?
Hey, you know what I found that’s really fucking interesting about this topic?
The ICJ found that there was no evidence before the court to substantiate Russia’s claims of genocide and that it was doubtful the Genocide Convention allows one country to use force in another based on alleged genocide, according to the court’s ruling.
Weird that the ICJ found probable cause in Palestine, but didn’t find anything in Ukraine.
Zionist loser says what.
You havent showed what post you downvoted, you didnt show your metrics, you didnt show if you were a part of the communities, it’s just a trust me bro.
I don’t care why you got banned, and I think it’s really funny because you keep engaging with me.
Eugene is in the thread FYI. I have been doing other things and reading other people’s comments rather than just responding to you, you know. You’re not the only person in my life. I got plenty of room for everyone.
DemSoc is not Marxist and hasn’t been since before the fall of the USSR.
No, it’s just clear your comprehension isn’t where it actually needs to be and you didn’t read that screenshot carefully enough to see what it actually says.
I bet the whole reason you don’t read Marxist theories is because you literally don’t understand what they’re saying.
You know something? I actually double-checked my profile after we had that conversation. I hadn’t said shit about Russia. You made wild accusations based on my instance and my profile.
I then corrected you when I said that Russia is not committing a genocide in Ukraine because they aren’t killing roughly 500 people a day like Israel is. That’s not to say Russia isn’t committing their own atrocities. There are plenty of mass graves in Ukraine that show the ferocity of Russian occupation.
Since a dem soc is literally the most radical position a liberal takes, you’re a radical liberal. It’s almost like you don’t understand political terms.
No idea, simply repeating the argument that you posted in the screenshot from that eugenevdebs
Well, to play devil’s advocate, we don’t actually know if it was a Hamas. Witnesses are notoriously unreliable, There hasn’t been any other corroborating evidence. In Rwanda and in Syria during those genocides, when those sexual assaults took place, we were able to track down individuals, where there was quite a lot less surveillance. Which is tracked by the UN.
Feels like random individual actors committed sexual violence, and then the Israeli government is blaming Hamas. Wouldn’t be the first time since they accused Hamas of being ISIS while literally arming ISIS groups in Gaza to help commit a genocide
Ooh, you’re gonna bust out a genetic fallacy. We’re gonna start with the fallacious arguments already?
Oh, so I’m a loser for spending any time looking at this, but he’s not a loser for talking a bunch of shit about politics that he does not understand and cannot take any criticism for and spending a bunch of time being a royal asshole to everybody who disagrees with him but I am loser.
Man, I gotta go make my own little whiny community on pifed, so then maybe the great Philip the Bucket won’t see me as such a loser.
SocDem is not a marxist or an anarchist.
Liberal does not count as a lefty. I’d much rather deal with anarchist comrades than liberal comrades.
Please keep posting that screenshot. If people actually read it, it does not say what you think it means.
No, I don’t care. I think you should go touch grass. I think this is fucking hilarious. I think you’re a whinger for having to go create your own community just to go whine about this.
No, I don’t care.
The person mentioned that there were numerous other places. I don’t know what they are. I’m not gonna sit here and go after them
I just think it’s funny you’re having a total meltdown about this.
It’s even better that you went out and made your own community in pifed.
What was Philip telling me that I need to go do? Oh, yeah, that I should go touch some grass. I wonder if I’m actually the person that needs to touch that grass.
Are you claiming that Hamas, systemically, as official policy, weaponized sexual violence on October 7th?
Because then, yeah, I think we’d have a problem.
Edit:
And it looks like you’re referring to that brand-new study that was just put out by that Israeli think-tank in their best effort to try and change what the definition of sexual violence is in order to get Hamas Blacklisted? Yeah, I remember that study. It’s already been specifically discredited by the UN and a number of NGOs.
Nah we are just enjoying all the bit of Schadenfreude.
You should be telling that to PJ who spends way too much time on Lemmy. I’m not the one who created a community just a removed about being blocked. Let them know to touch some grass while you’re at it.
Also, the irony of you saying this about a power user who posts quite literally hundreds of times a week.
He’s a genocide-supporting Zionist radlib who thinks it’s fun to spend his day insulting people who bring in Marxist/anarchist theory.
By the way, radlib is not an insult. It describes his political position 🙄
Finally, he even admitted that he is a loudmouth (tangentially), so I don’t know what you’re going on about here. Someone who will argue with you for 100 plus comments I would consider to be a “loudmouth”.
And, somehow, that’s not abusive. PJ giving downvotes and arguing about politics, though, is.
It would be insulting to describe what he does as debating or arguing. He spends most of the time using falicious techniques in order to try and point score the best he can, so that he doesn’t actually have to engage with anything you say, and then when you bring up something specific, he’ll just ignore the point.
It’s also entirely inappropriate to follow a user around to small communities that you’re not a part of to downvote when the voting system is supposed to be whether or not a post matches the tone of the community.
It’s unfortunate you’re unable to view nuance.
https://lemmy.ml/post/33527767
Yeah, this had put a target on his back in any lefty instance.
Also, following a user from tiny community to tiny community that you’re not a part of just to downvote their posts that you disagree with personally because you got into an argument with somebody is a bit extreme and I agree with the admins that they did the right thing.
Nah, I just read through the screenshot you posted a little more carefully and noticed how you were going from tiny communities with less than 50 users that you were not a part of and were downvoting that person’s posts, which is a direct violation of the spirit of the communities and the way the voting system on Lemmy is supposed to work.
I went from thinking the admin’s a little heavy-handed to thinking you earned it. 👍
I kinda think you made your own bed.
Edit:
Following someone from community to community to downvote, things that you disagree with personally, is an abuse of the vote system, and an abuse of the community system, I think he was absolutely right in blocking you.
Let this be a lesson. Downvote people in the threads that you’re participating in and in the communities you belong to, and stay out of the communities you don’t.
He tends to get into a fight every single time I see him post and somebody says something that’s even slightly controversial, which results in an easily hundred long comment thread.
He’s more than willing to follow you around from thread to thread to and from community to community If he sees something on your profile he doesn’t like or he disagrees with your political opinions.
If this is a Lemmy, anarchist instance, full of a bunch of super lefties, they’re not gonna appreciate a Radlib coming in trying to start shit up and downvoting a bunch of people. They’re probably just gonna block him like they have.
I think the recommendation here is if you’re gonna downvote people, you probably want to just stick to downvoting people directly in the thread you’re engaging with and not go in that person’s profile and downvote every single thing they’ve ever done. Or claim that every single thing they’ve ever done is something you disagree with.
Unfortunately, he’s a prolific proster, and some of his stuff is funny 🤷
I mean, if you’re downvoting everybody’s page, and claiming that you just disagree with everything they post, then yeah, I can see why they would ban you.
Unfortunately for you, you’re not exactlu sunshine and rainbows, so I can imagine people aren’t exactly willing to just take you at your word.
I don’t care, I am just pointing out the hypocrisy of the situation.
Oh, I don’t like engaging with him or any of his posts because he tends to be a loudmouth radlib but he is a power user and his posts on other communities are just fine.
It’d be nice if I could, like, put a comment on one of his political posts, though, without it turning into a gigantic, massive thread arguing about the specifics of electoralism and lesser evil and all of that nonsense.
Bummer. Will have to go read the links