@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
142Y

what do you mean trying to justify? discussion of shitty anti consumer tactics in digital media is perfectly valid

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
32Y

A screenshot of some comment is not really discussion though. This is a pretty base level understanding of the concept, which is why I say it’s more cope then actual discussion.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
22Y

This is one of the most popular posts this week here with more than 4 HUNDRED comments. I don’t know what you view as a discussion but I think this was a pretty successful attempt at creating one.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
12Y

I will say this thread had way more discussion then I was expecting when I originally posted this. My point about the screenshot still stands, I would much prefer we discuss something new related to sharing media, instead of recycling the same discussion about why its justified to copyright infringe.

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
[email protected]
Create a post
⚓ A community devoted to in-depth debate on topics concerning digital piracy, ethical problems, and legal advancements.

𝗣𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟!


Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles

4. Don’t be repetitious, spam, harass others, or submit low-quality posts

5. Don’t post questions already answered. READ THE WIKI


Image


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


  • 1 user online
  • 193 users / day
  • 35 users / week
  • 201 users / month
  • 803 users / 6 months
  • 0 subscribers
  • 534 Posts
  • 9.83K Comments
  • Modlog