https://lemm.ee/post/54155328/17905549 is the first example, where Call Me Leni/Lenny/Shinigamiookamiryuu posted a link to Twitter, and someone responded with “ew, Xitter Link”.
Call Me Leni/Lenny/Shinigamiookamiryuu replied with “Who is Xitter Link”? and it was explained that the owner of Twitter is a Nazi, to which Call Me Leni/Lenny/Shinigamiookamiryuu responded with “The whole salute thing has been debunked though.” Call Me Leni/Lenny/Shinigamiookamiryuu locked the thread after members replied to the statement of the salute being debunked.
29 days ago, someone made a thread on a Support community on Lemmy.world https://lemm.ee/post/55188600 and this prompted Call Me Leni/Lenny/Shinigamiookamiryuu to do what other users perceived as doubling down:
You do not speak for my intent for things that were said years ago that I already received karma for.
I might as well say it outright this time around, but I’ve consulted admins (who have done a thing or two about it) about your deceptive, witch-hunting grudge towards me in the past, and I’m not outside doing it again.
You are free to AMA if you are confused. I don’t know who may or may not consider my reliable, but at least the asker would get to be the judge on that with both perspectives having been examined, and I will provide proofs too.
The shipping thread was a thread made out of jest, and everyone else was used up, and I made the pairing.
Now, before you mention the third thing showcased, keep in mind I was banned before March 28th 2023 (for reasons I could get into but which should get their own block), which is the date it mentions. Several people can attest to this. I think this should be taken as a sign most people here are far too unquestioning.
As for the “semantic argument”, I am explaining what I meant. Because I’m relaying the semantics I meant by explaining those semantics. Everyone except the person I was responding to responded to me with confusion at the time, including Danish and including the rule enforcers. They knew what I meant, or I would have been out of there a lot sooner.
So let me get this straight; you’re arguing that everything is okay because you got punished for it in the past? And that the act itself was not actually bad because it was just proship fanfic stuff?
I would venture to guess you wouldn’t want things you said or did years ago to follow you forever either just because someone who has a grudge on you has the power to bring it up. Rough analogy, but it would be like saying it’s alright for a guy who served a few years in prison for a bank robbery to be run out of his new home by the bankers just because what he did before he served time was “not okay”.
Sex offenders have a high chance of re-offending in your example, and are essentially branded for life by the state. In particular, sex crimes involving minors. I know the stigma of having made mistakes in your past, but the difference that time makes is the development of remorse, steps towards not doing the same thing, and being a better person.
If you want to appeal to a sense of rehabilitation, please tell me what you did and how it was wrong and how you’re feeling about it. I don’t believe in a permanent brand even for some actions, but if you’re remorseless then what’s to make me believe you? And before you ask me why I’m painting myself as an arbiter, just remember that one person friendly to your cause could turn the tide of canceling.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Rules
Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it’s name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub’s intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don’t get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
This is the same user that’s been accused of grooming minors, right? I’m still confused about that whole situation, to be honest.
deleted by creator
Wtf
Wait for the incoming Dailymotion videos!
Waiting patiently 🙏
You do not speak for my intent for things that were said years ago that I already received karma for.
I might as well say it outright this time around, but I’ve consulted admins (who have done a thing or two about it) about your deceptive, witch-hunting grudge towards me in the past, and I’m not outside doing it again.
You are free to AMA if you are confused. I don’t know who may or may not consider my reliable, but at least the asker would get to be the judge on that with both perspectives having been examined, and I will provide proofs too.
Are you triagonal on Deviantart? If so, why were you asking for erotica about you going on a date with a teenager?
That’s the neat part, I wasn’t. That wasn’t what was being said.
Ok, so what did you mean?
The only word in my request that could’ve meant anything NSFW was the word “date”, yet it can also just mean time spent out.
I feel like you’re making a semantic argument here rather than explaining what your comment meant.
Also, you mentioned danish in a shipping thread, does shipping not mean pushing for a romantic relationship between the people mentioned?
The shipping thread was a thread made out of jest, and everyone else was used up, and I made the pairing.
Now, before you mention the third thing showcased, keep in mind I was banned before March 28th 2023 (for reasons I could get into but which should get their own block), which is the date it mentions. Several people can attest to this. I think this should be taken as a sign most people here are far too unquestioning.
As for the “semantic argument”, I am explaining what I meant. Because I’m relaying the semantics I meant by explaining those semantics. Everyone except the person I was responding to responded to me with confusion at the time, including Danish and including the rule enforcers. They knew what I meant, or I would have been out of there a lot sooner.
So let me get this straight; you’re arguing that everything is okay because you got punished for it in the past? And that the act itself was not actually bad because it was just proship fanfic stuff?
I would venture to guess you wouldn’t want things you said or did years ago to follow you forever either just because someone who has a grudge on you has the power to bring it up. Rough analogy, but it would be like saying it’s alright for a guy who served a few years in prison for a bank robbery to be run out of his new home by the bankers just because what he did before he served time was “not okay”.
Sex offenders have a high chance of re-offending in your example, and are essentially branded for life by the state. In particular, sex crimes involving minors. I know the stigma of having made mistakes in your past, but the difference that time makes is the development of remorse, steps towards not doing the same thing, and being a better person.
If you want to appeal to a sense of rehabilitation, please tell me what you did and how it was wrong and how you’re feeling about it. I don’t believe in a permanent brand even for some actions, but if you’re remorseless then what’s to make me believe you? And before you ask me why I’m painting myself as an arbiter, just remember that one person friendly to your cause could turn the tide of canceling.