You could be seen by us citing the same exact thing the last time you brigaded against this person, before you too got temporarily banned from the community. But let’s entertain your thought for a moment. Right away, it says “wrong account, sorry” as the entry near the top. This isn’t something that we would find if modlogs were infallible enough to call proof, now would it? This is especially true when the logic is circular and they made their decision to ban the person based on the same brigading.
yet another alt
TIL using a common Spongebob meme/joke somehow makes you an alt of other people who watch Spongebob.
If you’re sure it was a coincidence, maybe act like it. The Spongebob fandom is a thing, and looking into the name “PatrickStar” doesn’t yield anything related to anyone who does art, unless you’re trying to say that you shouldn’t bear the name of anyone who has ever been in an art community itself, in which case you’d be guilty too as there are a few sicksigma individuals out there in art communities by your own logic. Yet some of us are confronting you as people who have observed your brigading behavior in the past.
^ This account goes back 3 years. Yours is from right before lemm.ee shut down. You’re not fooling anyone.
That’s not an artist. That’s a user that’s never posted anything.
And should a mod mistakenly buy your argument that I’m you, that’s fine: I’ll just make another alt to call out your alts. We got banned Leny/Leni/[email protected] six months ago, we haven’t stopped getting your alts banned since, and we’re not going to.
Some art is visible only to forumers/members. And who is saying you are anyone else here? Unless you’re saying you’re not the people you’re accusing everyone of being, in which case you saying you’ll “make another alt to call out your alts” doesn’t help your case. It shows what the real mindset is here. And people wonder why I have my doubts about the severity of the alt problem?
We’re going to keep pushing you off of our platform. Unlike corporate social media, we don’t want the kind of “user engagement” that trolls like you provide.
The way you talk makes it sound like you want to be all high and mighty. I understand vigilantism can do that, but if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub), your findings are simply false. Think of who you actually speak for.
if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub)
I don’t know what mod/comm you’re talking about, but some of your banned alts were mods, and so is this one, which created [email protected], so that’s possible.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Rules
Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it’s name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub’s intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don’t get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
You could be seen by us citing the same exact thing the last time you brigaded against this person, before you too got temporarily banned from the community. But let’s entertain your thought for a moment. Right away, it says “wrong account, sorry” as the entry near the top. This isn’t something that we would find if modlogs were infallible enough to call proof, now would it? This is especially true when the logic is circular and they made their decision to ban the person based on the same brigading.
TIL using a common Spongebob meme/joke somehow makes you an alt of other people who watch Spongebob.
If you’re sure it was a coincidence, maybe act like it. The Spongebob fandom is a thing, and looking into the name “PatrickStar” doesn’t yield anything related to anyone who does art, unless you’re trying to say that you shouldn’t bear the name of anyone who has ever been in an art community itself, in which case you’d be guilty too as there are a few sicksigma individuals out there in art communities by your own logic. Yet some of us are confronting you as people who have observed your brigading behavior in the past.
I’m guessing they just observed the details.
Please, stop projecting, Leni.
https://www.deviantart.com/sicksigma
^ This account goes back 3 years. Yours is from right before lemm.ee shut down. You’re not fooling anyone.
https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=21321958
You didn’t even fool the people in the Piracy sub. Think about that. The Piracy sub took issue with you taking peoples’ names.
That’s not an artist. That’s a user that’s never posted anything.
And should a mod mistakenly buy your argument that I’m you, that’s fine: I’ll just make another alt to call out your alts. We got banned Leny/Leni/[email protected] six months ago, we haven’t stopped getting your alts banned since, and we’re not going to.
Some art is visible only to forumers/members. And who is saying you are anyone else here? Unless you’re saying you’re not the people you’re accusing everyone of being, in which case you saying you’ll “make another alt to call out your alts” doesn’t help your case. It shows what the real mindset is here. And people wonder why I have my doubts about the severity of the alt problem?
@[email protected], @[email protected], @[email protected], yet another Leni/Lenny alt, I believe.
You: calls a squad in to help you confront people unprovoked
Also you: wonders why peoples’ modlogs claim people are other often-unrelated people
We’re going to keep pushing you off of our platform. Unlike corporate social media, we don’t want the kind of “user engagement” that trolls like you provide.
Spoken like someone just trying to be inciteful.
The way you talk makes it sound like you want to be all high and mighty. I understand vigilantism can do that, but if you’re equating them with me (and that mod you accused in the Piracy sub), your findings are simply false. Think of who you actually speak for.
I’m pretty sure @[email protected] isn’t a vigilante.
I don’t know what mod/comm you’re talking about, but some of your banned alts were mods, and so is this one, which created [email protected], so that’s possible.
That depends on your definition.