removed by mod
fedilink
1.62K
@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
52Y

While I generally agree, the project needs to be big enough that somebody looks through the code. I would argue Microsoft word is safer than some l small abandoned open source software from some Russian developer

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
122Y

no, proprietary software its always possible malware and you have no weapon against it. being able to audit is always better.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
22Y

That’s true, but I’m not a programmer and on a GitHub project with 3 stars I can’t count on someone else doing it. (Of course this argument doesnt apply to big projects like libre office) With Microsoft I can at least trust that they will be in trouble or at least get bad press when doing something malicious.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
12Y

undefined> With Microsoft I can at least trust that they will be in trouble

lol yeah if anybody finds out… something something NSA

Cyclohexane
link
fedilink
English
22Y

I mean if a github project has only 3 stars, it means no one is using it. Why does safety matter here? Early adopting anything has risks.

This is kind of a false comparison. If it has 3 stars then it doesn’t even qualify for this conversation as literally no one is using it.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
7
edit-2
2Y

Ehmm. if nobody uses it, it kinda doen’t matter if it’s safe. And for this example: I bet more people had a look at the code of LibreOffice than MS Office. And i dont think it sends telemetry home in default settings.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
22Y

I think they’re talking about onlyoffice.

Create a post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 1 user online
  • 828 users / day
  • 79 users / week
  • 904 users / month
  • 2.75K users / 6 months
  • 0 subscribers
  • 2.97K Posts
  • 31.5K Comments
  • Modlog