@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
02Y

The harm is only caused by those that would have bought the game if the avenue of piracy did not exist.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
02Y

And the harm is in no way different from someone not buying the game because they aren’t interested in the game.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
02Y

No, there is a difference, and my apologies for not responding to your statement about the mechanism.

The mechanism of harm caused by the first group (those that would have bought the game if the avenue of piracy did not exist), is that by choosing to pirate instead, they are removing their contribution to the profitability of the company and causing an increase in price to remain profitable. These increased prices cause undue burden only on those people purchasing the product.

There is no mechanism of harm caused by the second group (someone not buying the game because they aren’t interested in the game). In this case there would be no alternative action if the avenue of piracy did not exist because this group would still not purchase the game.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-12Y

And the creator of the piece of media can tell the difference… How?

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
[email protected]
Create a post
⚓ A community devoted to in-depth debate on topics concerning digital piracy, ethical problems, and legal advancements.

𝗣𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟!


Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles

4. Don’t be repetitious, spam, harass others, or submit low-quality posts

5. Don’t post questions already answered. READ THE WIKI


Image


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


  • 1 user online
  • 193 users / day
  • 35 users / week
  • 201 users / month
  • 803 users / 6 months
  • 0 subscribers
  • 534 Posts
  • 9.83K Comments
  • Modlog