• 1 Post
  • 9 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 09, 2023

help-circle
rss

Yeah, I’m not doing anything wrong. Thing is, I’m not the one who would be deciding if the things I’m doing are wrong. The people who would be deciding are determined to find fault with everyone.


What if an instance were able to block specific communities on other instances without defederating?


It would make sense in context, if you’re talking about a video or video tape. Otherwise it would get confused with a cassette tape player.



Literally no one called them VHSs. They were just called video tapes. The players were called VCRs.


Elon Musk just said that people without children shouldn’t be allowed to vote.


Why do you care more about what the law requires you to do than you care about simply treating people decently? You can recognize a person’s rights even if the law doesn’t demand it.

And why do I get the feeling that you wouldn’t recognize the civil rights of those who you do view as having “immutable characteristics” if the law didn’t tell you that you had to?

The law is there because of people like you, to make you recognize peoples rights because you seem to be incapable of doing so otherwise.

Your entire argument reeks of you asking “What kind of shitty behavior can I get away with?”



I understand what they are, I’m asking if there is a name for the category of characteristic that they both belong to.

I’m not entirely sure there is a word for it. If not, maybe there should be.


“Cis” and “trans” are different types of a person’s… what?
What are cis and trans alternate types of? I don't think it's "gender identity" because wouldn't that just be man, woman or nonbinary regardless of whether they're cis or trans? Cis/trans just being a qualifier? If the answer is "I am cis" or "I am trans", what is the question? Edit: Someone came up with the term "gender congruity" and (after looking up the definition of "congruity") I think this describes what I'm talking about perfectly.
fedilink