Sometimes it is, say here:
https://fedidb.org/current-events/threadiverse
But you might as well say why isn’t Mastodon included? Kbin is a fundamentally different platform and architecture, even if the two are largely compatible (as is Mastodon, to a slightly lesser extent with Lemmy).
It is perfectly reasonable to look at the growth of Lemmy, think of it like quoting use of one flavour of Linux - Linux uptake overall is also interesting, but not the same.
I think it’s we’ll known Lemmy has a problem with bots signing up (in their millions), hence the warning on that measure in my link above.
If we look at another site:
https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats
https://kbin.fediverse.observer/dailystats
Basically the same stats.
These seem to suggest 120 posts per day per Lemmy user - I’d agree something is off.
But then try looking at a few users in this thread (which lets note is on a Lemmy instance). From my spot checks about half the comments are from kbin users?
This seems to highlight a common misconception, kbin isn’t really any smaller than Lemmy when we look at active users, in fact it seems it has only just (three days ago) caught up:
https://fedidb.org/current-events/threadiverse
Somehow Lemmy seems to have stronger brand recognition, and people often seem say Lemmy to mean things which include Lemmy and kbin users/platforms.
Actually I don’t think downvotes federate with kbin (I’m not sure about between Lemmy instances?)
Downvotes are not intrinsically part of the ActivityPub standard.
…but yes upvotes federate just fine!