It literally has a passage from the report in it, that’s the citation. It references Winkler at the end but he’s not the source.
From the actual 1919 inquiry:
spoiler
It is true that both independents and Communists played a leading role in the action, and also that both independents and Communists warned against it. For example, Rosa Luxemburg appears to have thoroughly disapproved of the plan […] more than 60 belonged to the USPD and little more than 10 to the KPD. […] This is not to say that they had long been planning this action specifically for 5 January, or that they were the ones on 4 and 5 January who most eagerly urged the attack.”
The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.
Yes, I get it, you despise education. You made it clear the first time.
You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.
The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.
Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:
The elections hadn’t happened yet. That’s what the Spartacist uprising was trying to prevent - upcoming elections that they were not even barred from running in.
But tell me more about how the only response to an anti-democratic coup was to roll over and let the People’s Fascists™ execute everyone and suppress democracy.
The KPD literally voted on the subject, lmao. Talk about ignorance - or willingly spreading lies. It’s difficult to tell with fascists.
Yes, Luxemburg herself thought it was a bad idea and voted against it. Luxemburg voted, in fact, to participate in the upcoming elections, which is, according to red fascists like you, bourgeois. Damn that neolib Luxemburg!
She was outvoted by the KPD leadership, which preferred a coup.
Sorry that you’re incapable of parsing any sentence that isn’t asspatting fascism. I understand it’s a serious condition.
You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.
The way I behave being… calling you out on spreading disinformation in service to fascist ideals?
Wow, what a terrible way for an educated person to act. I see why a fascist bootlicker like you hates it.
Dude. Just fucking stop. This is going way beyond into pretty disgusting territory.
Edited to add: Your “response” is noted. Not into the casual sexism, and I find it extremely odd that you had no idea about goat. Just going to go ahead and save myself the headache now and block.
I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”
Lmao. Sorry that you can’t comprehend calling someone sweetie unless they’re female? My post history is full of it. Go ahead, use the search function - ah, what am I saying? Facts are inconvenient little things, I know you despise them.
Sorry, sweetie, that I didn’t regard you lowly enough to condescend to until you started engaging in genocide denial and simping for fascism. :)
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Rules
Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it’s name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub’s intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don’t get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
It literally has a passage from the report in it, that’s the citation. It references Winkler at the end but he’s not the source.
From the actual 1919 inquiry:
spoiler
The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.
You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.
Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:
Sorry that you’re incapable of parsing any sentence that isn’t asspatting fascism. I understand it’s a serious condition.
The way I behave being… calling you out on spreading disinformation in service to fascist ideals?
Wow, what a terrible way for an educated person to act. I see why a fascist bootlicker like you hates it.
Ew.
Dude. Just fucking stop. This is going way beyond into pretty disgusting territory.
Edited to add: Your “response” is noted. Not into the casual sexism, and I find it extremely odd that you had no idea about goat. Just going to go ahead and save myself the headache now and block.
does goat send you asshole DMs too?
That’s the kind of response I would expect from someone who’s incapable of reading what I wrote.
But no, I’ve been lucky enough to be spared that, though Goat doing so caused me to unsubscribe from MOG.
I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”
Lmao. Sorry that you can’t comprehend calling someone sweetie unless they’re female? My post history is full of it. Go ahead, use the search function - ah, what am I saying? Facts are inconvenient little things, I know you despise them.
Sorry, sweetie, that I didn’t regard you lowly enough to condescend to until you started engaging in genocide denial and simping for fascism. :)
You used it this way, once, 9 months ago, against a person whose gender I didn’t bother to investigate.
Sorry, I know that’s higher than you can count and more words than you can read.
This validates what I said.
First one is not the same use
Second one is the one I mentioned
third is not the same use or the same word
fourth one is a different word and not the same use
lmao yeah that was my cue to disengage and go to bed
You’re certainly better at avoiding bait than I am :D